Senior correspondent, Ranchi : The Supreme Court, while hearing the SLP filed in the case of road dispute in Hinnu, has said that the movement of people cannot be closed. The division bench of Justice JK Maheshwari and Justice Sanjay Karol upheld the decision of the Jharkhand High Court, terming it correct. Said: There is no need to interfere in this. Also the court rejected the SLP.
Earlier, Jharkhand High Court advocate Shashank Shekhar presented the case on behalf of the defendants. It is noteworthy that applicant Anju Minj had challenged the decision of Jharkhand High Court by filing an SLP in the Supreme Court. On March 28, 2022, the Jharkhand High Court passed an order directing the removal of the boundary wall built on the road in front of Geeta Devi’s house. After this, Ranchi Municipal Corporation had opened the road by removing the boundary wall built on the road.
What did Jharkhand High Court say?
On March 28, 2022, the court of Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi of Jharkhand High Court heard the criminal writ petition filed by Geeta Devi and others in the road dispute case in Hinu. The court had orally said that no one can interfere in anyone’s fundamental rights. If there is a way, it cannot be closed. As far as the ownership rights of the land are concerned, the court is not deciding the ownership rights here. The interveners can approach the competent court for ownership rights. Expressing displeasure against the intervener, an order was also given to impose a compensation of Rs 1 lakh.